TAKE HEED INDEED. I'VE WITNESSED
FIRST HAND THE EVASIVE TACTICTS OF COX'S OFFICE WHEN
ATTEMPTING TO PRESENT EVIDENCE THAT MR. ANDREW KOCHANOWSKI
(P55117) FILED AN ACTION AGAINST
A FORMER CLIENT TO
SUPRESS EVIDENCE HE'D BEEN LYING TO HIS CLIENT,
MISLEAD A JUDGE & DID NOT REVEAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST.
I CALLED AG COX
BECAUSE HE HAS NOT
BEEN UPHOLDING THE MICHIGAN SUPREME COURTS RULE OF LAW
REGARDING THE ATTORNEY GREIVANCE COMMISSIONS MANDATE TO "SELF-GOVERN
ITSELF IN THE INTEREST OF THE
PEOPLE OF MICHIGAN" INSTEAD,
AS LARRY HOLLAND ABOVE DISCUSSES, THEY'VE BEEN ACTING IN
THE INTERST OF ATTORNEY GENERAL COX AND FRIEND OF
FRIEND ATTYS.
MR. KOCHANOWSKI WILL NOT FILE A COMPLAINT
AGAINST THE ABOVE FACTS BECAUSE HE KNOWS I HAVE
EVIDENCE: (A) COMPANY CHECK &
RECEIPT OF PURCHASE OF A COMPILER FOR SOURCE
CODE HE WITHELD FROM THE COURT
AGAINST CLIENTS INSISTENCE, THREATENING TO QUIT
IF CLIENT CONTINUED TO ARGUE IT WAS MOST
VALUABLE EVIDENCE.
(B) ALUMNI INFO. ON
HIS CLASSMATE STEVE BALLMER FROM 1973 AT SMALL
ELITE DETROIT COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL
WHERE MR. BALLMER WAS AN EXTREME STAND-OUT
STUDENT, AND IS NOW A WORLD KNOWN FIGURE IN THE
DEFENSE IN THE CLIENTS CASE, THOMPSON V.
MICROSOFT. HIGHBEAM RESEARCH REPORTS "BALLMER
LOYAL GUY
COUNTRY DAY FOLKS SAY...CALLS HEADMASTER EVERY
WEEK...VISITS MICHIGAN"
(C) MR.
KOCHANOWSKI CALLS MUTUAL WITNESS TELLS HIM TO
CONVINCE "THOMPSON" TO SETTLE HE HAS NO CHANCE
(D) IN PPO FILED AFTER THOMPSON DISCOVERS
EVIDENCE OF MALICE, WITHOLDING EVIDENCE,
KOCHANOWSKI TELLS
JUDGE THAT HE PERSONALLY KNOWS THROUGH HIS
PARTNER, "I THOUGHT HE HAD A DECENT CHANCE OF
SUCCESS"
(E) TELLS "THOMPSON" EITHER TAKE
THE SETTLEMENT OFFER (APPROX. 0.003% OF PLANT &
MORAN DAMAGE CALC)
OR THE FIRM WILL NOT CONTINUE. THIS, DESPITE A
LETTER FROM THE FIRMS BOARD HEAD STATING THEY
WOULD CONTINUE
TO 6TH CIRCUIT COURT IF THE WASHINGTON D.C.
APPEALS DECISION IS FAVORABLE WHICH IT WAS.
(F) THOMPSON ATTEMPTS TO GET CASE INTO THE
HANDS OF BROOKS KUSHMAN BUT IT IS TOO LATE IN
THE CASE FOR
THE NOBLE FIRM OF BROOKS KUSHMAN TO TAKE ON.
KOCHANOWSKI MEETS WITH THOMPSON IN COFFEE
SHOP AND PRESENTS THOMPSON WITH DIFFERENT COPY
OF SETTLEMENT PAPERS WITH SLIPPED IN
AGREEMENT FOR IMMUNITY FOR ANY ATTORNEY AT
SOMMERS & SCHWARTZ.
(G) THOMPSON SPENDS 2
YEARS FILING GRIEVANCE AND GETTING BRIEF
STATEMENT BACK "YOU ARE ATTEMPTING
A JUDICIAL PROCEEDING" CASE CLOSED. THOMPSON
FILED ALL PROPER FORMS, ISSUE WAS CLEARLY
UNHEEDED DUE
TO RELATIONSHIP OF KOCHANOWSKI TO A 17-YEAR
PARTNER WHO HAS BEEN ON THE GRIEVANCE BOARD
MANY TIMES.
THIS WILL HAVE TO BE
DEALT WITH IN A CRIMINAL MATTER AS MR. KOCH.
APPEARS TO HAVE CALLED HIS ATTY FRIENDS TO
HEAD-OFF ANY ABUSE OF PROCESS OR MALICIOUS
PETITION CHARGES. THIS BEHAVIOR IS RAMPANT IN
MICHIGAN.
MR. COX IS THE COUNSEL FOR THE
DEPT. OF HUMAN SERVICES, AND THE DHS THUS FAR
HAS NOT INVESTIGATED MY REQUESTS FOR THEM TO
INVESTIGATE MR. KOCHANOWSKI'S RECKLESS
ENDANGERMENT OF HIS OWN FAMILY (THE DEPT. OF HUMAN
SERVICES HAS BEEN CALLED A 2ND TIME @ 4:55pm on
07/28/2010 TO INVESTIGATE THIS) , INCLUDING AS A
LAST PARAGRAPH IN HIS LENGTHLY COMPLAINT OF
MIS-STATEMENTS, A CONCLUDING PARAGRAPH THAT HIS
FAMILY IS AFRAID - HOW DOES A 20-YEAR ATTORNEY
INFORM HIS FAMILY OF A FEAR HE HAD ONLY HIMSELF
BECOME AWARE OF EXPLITLY VIA EVIDENCE SENT IN AN
E-MAIL HE HAD BEEN USING WITH HIS CLIENT, AT HIS
INITIATION, SINCE 2005?
AN E-MAIL USED BY
MR. KOCH. TO SOLICIT AN EXPERT REPORT FROM THE
CLIENT (WHEN MR. KOCHANOWSKI WAS SUPPOSED TO BE
WORKING ON HIS CASE, THOMPSON V MICROSOFT) FOR
NETJUMPER V. GOOGLE, THAT MR. KOCH. SAID "I HAVE
ANOTHER ASSIGNMENT FOR YOU" YET TOLD THE JUDGE
HE DID NOT SOLICIT IT? DOES NETJUMPER KNOW
THAT MR. KOCH. USED THE CLIENT, AND HANDED OFF
THE REPORT TO DR. HARDING IN ANN ARBOR THE
APPARENT OFFICIAL EXPERT WITNESS?
DOES
GOOGLE KNOW THE CLIENT RESISTED IN PRODUCING A
SECOND REPORT BECAUSE HE WAS CONCERNED HIS OWN
ATTORNEY WAS MIXING IN WORK OF OTHER CASES WHEN
HE WAS SUPPOSED TO BE WORKING ON HIS OWN CLIENTS
CASE?
THE CLIENT HIMSELF, WAS CONCERNED
ABOUT MR. KOCHANOWSKIS INSISTENCE ON A "REVISED"
2ND REPORT PUSHING CERTAIN ISSUES, AND THE
CLIENT INSISTED HE COULD NOT CONTINUE BECAUSE
HIS OWN CASE WAS NOT BEING GIVEN PROPER
ATTENTION AND MR. KOCH. WAS WELL AWARE OF A
HEALTH ISSUE OF THE CLIENT AT THE TIME. THE
CLIENT HAS HIS EXPERT REPORT AND ALL EVIDENCE
AND ALL HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE AGC, BUT LIKE
THE ABOVE THE "GRIEVANCES WERE UNHEEDED."
IF MR. COX CANNOT MANAGE THE STATE OF
MICHIGANS LEGAL AFFAIRS AND UP HOLD THE RULE OF
LAW REGARDING THE AGC, HOW CAN HE BE EXPECTED TO
MANAGE THE AFFAIRS OF THE ENTIRE STATE? I
SUSPECT UNDER MR. COX AS GOVERNOR, THE STATE
WOULD GROW IN CORRUPTION UNDER HIS RULE.
MR. COX, YOU ARE A DISGRACE REGARDING THE
MATTERS AT THE TOP OF THIS PAGE, AND YOU DO NOT
BELONG AS OUR GOVERNOR, NOR IN ANY POSITION OF
GOVERNMENT. I'D VOTE FOR THE SHERIFF OF
OAKLAND COUNTY LONG BEFORE I'D EVEN THINK OF
LETTING YOU INTO ANOTHER POSITION IN GOVERNMENT.
YOU ABUSE POWER. WE NEED PEOPLE WHO DO NOT. I
CANNOT IMAGINE THE THINGS ABOUT YOUR CONDUCT WE
DON'T KNOW (YET).
ANY PURPORTED
CORRECTIONS TO THE ABOVE CAN BE SUBMITTED
HERE. I
HAVE CONTACTED THE U.S. ATTORNEYS OFFICE AND THE
FEDERAL JUDGE PRESIDING OVER MY ORIGINAL CASE
AND WILL BE FILING MY PAPERS WITH THE MICHIGAN
SUPREME COURT TO ATTEMPT TO GET TO THE BOTTOM OF
THIS ISSUE. OF COURSE, MR. COX AND
MR. KOCHANOWSKI ARE VERY LIKELY TO DO ANYTHING
THEY CAN, INCLUDING CONTACTING JUDGES THEY KNOW
AND STOP ME.
I SUSPECT IN THE END THAT MY
CASE WAS MANAGED FOR HIS CLASSMATE STEVE
BALLMER, CEO OF MICROSOFT CORP. AND FELLOW
CLASSMATE OF COUNTRY DAY ACADEMY IN 1973.
HE TOOK MY CASE, DID NOT REVEAL CONFLICT OF
INTEREST AND THEN MANAGED THE DAMAGES TO SUCH A
LOW LEVEL THAT HE KNEW I WOULD NOT HAVE MONEY
FOR COUNSIL WHEN I DISCOVERED CERTAIN FACTS. THE
DAMAGES PLANT & MORAN CALCULATED WERE SO HIGH
THEY INFURIATED MR. KOCHANOWSKI.
I WILL
CONTINUE TO CONTACT STATE AND FEDERAL LEGAL
AGENCIES TO SEE IF ANY FEDERAL LAWS HAVE BEEN,
OR ARE BEING BROKEN BY MR. COX, AND OF COURSE
MR. KOCHANOWSKI. I HAVE EVIDENCE THAT HE LIED TO
THE JUDGE BUT IN FACT, HE KNOWS THE JUDGE
THROUGH A MUTUAL FRIEND AND PARTNER OF 17-YEARS.
ONE ATTORNEY I MET WITH COULD NOT BELIEVE THIS
AND CONCLUDED THAT THERE "WAS CLEAR MISCONDUCT
HERE."
COX IS NOT UPHOLDING THE MICHIGAN
SUPREME COURTS RULE OF LAW REGARDING THE AGC,
AND THERE APPEARS TO BE FURTHER CORRUPTION. THIS
IS A MAN WHO HAD THREATENED TO SUE THE FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT OVER HEALTHCARE. IN MY PERSONAL
OPINION, HE IS FULL OF LUST FOR SELF-PROMOTION
IN THE POSITION HE HOLDS, AND THIS OPINION IS
NOT MINE ALONE. A SIMILAR OPINION IS EVIDENT BY
THE JUDGES SCOLDING OF MR. COX FOR BRINGING
WRONGFUL CHARGES IN THE INTEREST OF
SELF-PUBLICITY (SEE ABOVE).
AS MANY ARE
WRITING ON MESSAGES BOARDS ACROSS THE STATE -
"FOR MICHIGAN GOVERNOR: ANYBODY BUT COX."
